30
2023

03
Modeling and Experimental Study of OreCarbon Briquette Reduction under CO–CO2 Atmosphere (2)
Keywords:
orecarbon briquette,CO–CO2 atmosphere, reduction
Source: internal company
4. Solution Method
5. Results and Discussion
Gaseous reduction of iron ore particles has been extensively studied in its thermodynamics and kinetics. Generally, shrink unreacted core model is consistent with the stepwise of iron oxides. As the hematite particles are very small, the reactions that are given by Equations (1)–(3) were considered to proceed independently. Their reduction rates were thus described using a oneinterface unreacted shrinking core model, as Equation (19).
where K1 = exp(1.4456038/T) ，K1=exp(7.255+3720/T), and De,1= ∞ for R1; k2 = 1.70 exp(2.515 − 4811/T), K2=exp(5.289−4711/T) and De,2 =exp (−1.835− 7180/T)/Pg for R2; and, k3 = exp(0.805−7385/T), K3 = exp(−2.946+2744.63/T), andDe,3 = exp (0.485−8770/T)/Pg for R3 [35]. Defifinition of f i in Equation (19) is given in [32]. The internal gas diffusion resistance of R1 was not considered because the transformation of Fe2O3 to Fe3O4 (Equation (1)) proceeds very quickly in the initial stage of the briquette reduction.
In estimating NP in Equations (19)–(21), the true density of the hematite particles was assumed to be 5000 kg/m3 . γ in Equations (19)–(21) is a coeffificient for adjusting the specifific area of ore particles due to their irregular geometry, and it was determined to be 0.4 by a trialanderror method.
Mass change in the briquette during reduction was caused by several reactions; the reactions given by Equations (1)–(4) led to a decrease in mass, whereas the reaction given by Equation (5) led to an increase in mass. Measured and modelpredicted massloss fraction curves under different temperatures were compared, and the results are shown in Figure 3. In simulations, the briquette massloss fraction at time t was calculated using Equation (22).
Because the mass change of the briquette is affected by several reactions, it cannot adequately reflflect the briquette reduction behavior. However, the briquette reduction degree and carbon conversion are important parameters for evaluating the quality of the reduced briquette. In the simulations, the briquette reduction degree at time t was calculated using Equation (23), and the briquette carbon conversion at time t using Equation (24).
Briquette reduction under 1473 K was selected for further study of the briquette reduction progress because it displayed the major characteristics of hematitebiochar reduction under the oxidative atmosphere: fast reduction in the early stage and obvious metallic iron oxidation in the later stage.
The simulation results of the development of local PCO/PCO2, the local reduction degree profifile, and the local carbon conversion profifile on the briquette cross section are displayed in Figure 6. In Figure 6, the local reduction degree and carbon conversion at time t were calculated by 1.0 − (3ρFe2O3 /MFe2O3 + 4ρFe3O4 /MFe3O4 + ρFeO/MFeO)/(3ρFe2O3,0/MFe2O3 ) and 1.0 − ρC/ρC,0, respectively. These simulation results were then used to assume the reduction progress of the briquette. At the beginning stage, the dominant reactions were assumed as the reactions that are given by Equations (1), (2) and (4). Owing to the intense gas generation, the briquette reduction progress was assumed to not be inflfluenced by the atmosphere or gas diffusion. At 1 min, PCO/PCO2 was nearly uniformly profifiled at a level of approximately 4.0; both the reduction degree and the carbon conversion profifiles were uniform and at a degree of approximately 0.3. As time proceeded, the reactions that were given by Equations (3) and (4) became dominant. As the rate of generated product gas was reduced, the effect of gas diffusion increased. At 5 min, the atmosphere began to inflfluence the briquette reduction progress, and the PCO/PCO2 profifile in the briquette became uneven: at the core, it increased to 10.28, whereas at the surface, it only increased to 3.26. Correspondingly, the reduction degree increased to 0.88 at the core and to 0.60 at the surface, and carbon conversion increased to 0.76 at the core and to 0.90 at the surface. By 10 min, PCO/PCO2 remained higher than 2.95 in the internal part of the briquette (K5 = 2.95 under 1473 K), and reached 110 at the core, so that the reaction given by Equation (3) could still proceed there. However, PCO/PCO2 decreased to less than 2.95 at the surface of the briquette, and consequently, the reaction that was given by Equation (5) took place and became a dominant reaction. At 10 min, reduction degree increased in the internal area and reached 0.98 at the core; at the surface, it decreased to 0.50. By the end of the reduction, the dominant reactions changed to those given by Equations (4) and (5). The contour line of PCO/PCO2 = 2.95 became closer to the core, and PCO/PCO2 at the core decreased to 20.0, which reflflected that the atmosphere was extending its inflfluence toward the core. At 15 min, the reaction that was given by Equation (3) ceased. In the region with PCO/PCO2 > 2.95, the reduction degree remained higher than 0.90. However, the reaction given by Equation (5) became signifificant as the region with PCO/PCO2 < 2.95 was enlarged. The reduction degree at the surface further decreased to 0.40, and the weak gasifification of the remaining carbon particles was then attributed to CO2 from the atmosphere.
Figure 6. Simulation results on the development of the profifile of local PCO/PCO2, the profifile of local reduction degree, and the profifile of local carbon conversion.
Thus, the reduction of the briquette presented a mainly homogeneous reaction system in the period from 1 to 5 min, whereas the gas transfer and the oxidative atmosphere became considerable after 5 min. Both metallic reoxidation and iron oxide reduction appeared as the briquette neared its maximum reduction degree.
SEM–EDS results on intermittent morphologies at the briquette side surface in the reduction course at 1473 K are shown in Figure 7. The ore particles were uniformly distributed at 5 min (Figure 7a), and a mixture of tiny metallic iron grains (Point 1 in Figure 7b), wustite grains (Point 2 in Figure 7b), and gangue grains (Point 3 in Figure 7b) was presented within ore particles (Figure 7b). The deformation and the sintering of ore particles had occurred by 10 min (Figure 7c), and iron grains became scarce in the particles (Figure 7d). The decrease of iron grains was due to the reoxidation by the atmosphere, and the ore particle sintering and deforming were attributed to wustite reacting with gangue components (CaO, SiO2, and Al2O3) to form lowmeltingpoint compounds (glass phase). By 15 min, the sintering degree of ore particles had increased (Figure 7e), and the size of some remaining iron grains in ore particles was enlarged (Figure 7f). Iron grain growth was attributed to an agglomeration of tiny iron grains that was facilitated by the glass phase. Overall, the SEM–EDS results indicate that the briquette side surface underwent oxidation after 5 min in the reduction course, which was in accordance with the simulated reduction process. The intense selfreduction in the early reduction stages lead to crack generation at the briquette surface so that iron oxidation near the surface was accelerated in the later stage as the porosity near the surface was increased. Therefore, crack formation near the surface could be the main reason for the deviation between model predictions and the experimental measurements in the later stage of reduction, as shown in Figure 3c.
Figure 7. Intermittent scanning electron microscopy–energy dispersive spectrometry (SEM–EDS) results at the briquette surface: (a,b) 5 min; (c,d) 10 min; (e,f) 15 min; and (g–i) EDS results of Points 1, 2 and 3 in Figure 7b, respectively.
6. Conclusions
1. A model to predict the reduction behavior of the orecarbon briquette under CO–CO2 atmosphere was developed. The model included the kinetics of the stagewise reduction of iron oxide, carbon gasifification and metallic iron oxidation, and it was with the assumptions of constant porosity and size of the briquette. The simulation results were validated by the experimental measurements and observations and the model was found to be reliable.
2. The CO–CO2 atmosphere can signifificantly inflfluence the fifinal reduction degree of the briquette, and the briquette cannot reach higher fifinal reduction degree by further increasing the temperature. Under higher temperatures, more carbon is consumed by the reactive atmosphere.
3. In the briquette reduction progress, the briquette reduction behavior is not initially inflfluenced by the CO–CO2 atmosphere; however, near the maximum reduction degree, both iron oxide reduction and metallic iron reoxidation can occur in the briquette.
Tang, H., Yun, Z., Fu, X., & Du, S. Modeling and Experimental Study of OreCarbon Briquette Reduction under CO–CO2 Atmosphere. Metals, 8(4), 205. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8040205
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Related news
20240509
20240419
20240412
20240329